Putting Students First in Michigan’s School Safety Debate

While we wait for the outcome of the lawsuit — and for our special school board meeting to decide whether to accept or decline the state’s school safety funds — it’s been interesting to see how other districts are navigating the same issue.

Why Detroit Public Schools Community District recently agreed to the waiver:

1. The funding is too essential to walk away from

• Without it, Detroit would have had to cut positions that keep students mentally, emotionally, and physically safe.

2. The requirement stems from the Oxford aftermath

• The intent of the law is tied to school safety accountability after the 2021 Oxford tragedy, even though the language itself remains a major concern.

3. Michigan’s liability landscape is shifting

• Changes to immunity laws are already in motion statewide — with or without the waiver.

4. The funding cliff is real

• Like us, Detroit Schools relies on these dollars to support student success liaisons, counselors, mental health staff, and security teams.

5. Detroit Schools accepted the funds and joined the lawsuit

• Accepting the money doesn’t mean endorsing the waiver. It means protecting student support positions while simultaneously challenging the legality of the requirements.

As we weigh this decision locally, I keep coming back to our “Students First” value. Protecting the supports that keep kids safe, connected, and cared for must remain at the center of every choice we make.

➡️Read the full Chalkbeat story.


Discover more from TY FOR TCAPS

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.





Leave a comment